VDM Responds to Lawyer’s DNA Demand, Legal Threats, and Misrepresentation Claims

Full Transcript

The news now is that a lawyer has warned VeryDarkMan and called for a DNA test.

Do not ever refer to me as an activist. I am not one.

They accused me of cyberattacks, harassment, and criminal defamation.

They demanded retractions, apologies, and DNA tests.

Good. I like where this is going.

Nobody talked about abandonment. That narrative did not come from us.

Court does not scare anybody. We will go there if needed.

As for DNA, they are ready. Very ready.

One of them is a walking DNA.

This case has just started.

Peace and love. Don’t play.

Response to Legal Threats, DNA Demands, and False Characterizations

A press statement has circulated claiming that a lawyer has “warned” VeryDarkMan and called for a DNA test. This response addresses that claim in full.

Correction of a Fundamental Misrepresentation

First and foremost, VeryDarkMan rejects the label “activist.” He has consistently stated that he is not an activist and does not identify with that term. Any description to the contrary is inaccurate and deliberately misleading.

Context of the Press Conference

According to reports, the statement was made by 0, counsel to 1, senior pastor of 2 (also known as Grace Nation Liberation City), during a press conference held at the 3 Centre in Owerri, Imo State.

The lawyer alleged cyberattacks, bullying, harassment, stalking, and criminal defamation, describing public posts as false, malicious, defamatory, and misleading.

Demands Issued by Counsel

Immediate retraction of all online statements concerning Chris Okafor
A public apology published in two national dailies
Submission of the apology to relevant authorities
Cessation of any implied familial relationship
DNA testing of the young lady known as “Miss Chi” and her sibling

VDM’s Position on the DNA Demand

The call for DNA testing is welcomed. The parties involved are fully ready.

It is also noted that the introduction of an “abandonment” narrative did not originate from VDM or his platform. Its sudden appearance signals confusion rather than clarity.

One of the individuals in question, according to VDM, requires no DNA test to establish identity — her resemblance alone speaks volumes.

On Integrity and Legal Threats

VDM rejects the assertion that legal warnings equate to moral authority. Court proceedings are not a curse, and legal action does not intimidate him.

He further expressed disappointment that this particular counsel is representing the case, given prior personal interactions and shared moments during the period surrounding 4.

Defending integrity cannot coexist with enabling alleged oppression.

Questions That Must Be Answered

Before further discussion, VDM requests that Chris Okafor answer two questions:

Has Chris Okafor ever met VeryDarkMan?
Where did that meeting take place?

Once answered, those responses should be returned for public examination.

“This case has just started. Peace and love. Don’t play.”

Statement Summary

This statement addresses a press conference held by counsel to Dr. Chris Okafor, in which VeryDarkMan was described as a “self-acclaimed activist” and accused of cyberattacks, harassment, and defamation. The statement rejects these characterizations, clarifies misrepresentations, and responds directly to demands for retraction, apology, and DNA testing.

VDM affirms readiness for legal proceedings, welcomes DNA verification, and asserts that integrity cannot be defended through intimidation or selective outrage.

Next Steps & Oversight Actions

Document All Legal Demands
Preserve press statements, demands, and public claims for record and response.
Proceed With DNA Verification
Cooperate with testing at a mutually agreed, reputable medical facility.
Prepare Legal Response Strategy
Treat litigation as a procedural process, not a deterrent.
Maintain Evidence-Based Communication
Continue responding with facts, documentation, and consistency.