VDM Responds to Allegations, Harrison Gwamnishu’s Statement, and the Reality of the Charges

Full Transcript

People keep calling VeryDarkMan demonic, evil, wicked, jealous, envious. But it always comes with truth — and everybody knows it.

No matter the accusations, you cannot skip the video. You can insult, cry, accuse — you will still sit down and watch.

Harrison Gwamnishu made his first post. He said he was neither invited nor arrested, and that he voluntarily presented himself for investigation. He said he had not been charged.

This is where the problem starts. I don’t like lies. I don’t like damage control.

So let me read the charges for you.

High Court of Justice, Edo State. Criminal Motion 2025. Commissioner of Police versus Harrison Gwamnishu.

Charge one: obtaining ₦5.4 million under false pretence. Charge two: cybercrime offences. Charge three: causing the continuing kidnap of Zagiru Ibrahim.

These are serious charges. The judge exercised discretion.

You said you walked in voluntarily — so why didn’t you walk out?

Anything you say, I will counter with facts. Nigerians know this.

My job is not to jail people. My job is to put a permanent doubt in your character.

We have not even started. This is just the beginning.

China Ross. Mr Jollof. Many others. After the noise, the truth remains.

You cannot buy silence anymore. Once a case is public, I will speak.

Peace and love. Don’t play — if you play, you will learn the hard way.

VDM’s Position on Allegations, Truth, and Accountability

No matter the accusations or narratives pushed, one fact remains unchanged — people cannot skip the evidence. You may insult, cry, or accuse, but the video will still be watched. That is the law of public accountability.

Harrison Gwamnishu’s Statement

Harrison Gwamnishu made his first public post following the incident, stating that he was neither invited nor arrested, and that he voluntarily presented himself for investigation. He further claimed that he had not been charged, stating that the matter was still under review by the Directorate of Public Prosecution.

This is where the problem begins.

The Issue With Damage Control

VDM rejects lies and damage control. Once a claim is made publicly, it must withstand factual verification. In response to Harrison’s statement, VDM presented official court documents detailing multiple criminal charges.

Summary of Charges

• Charge One: Obtaining ₦5.4 million under false pretence relating to ransom payments, contrary to the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006.
• Charge Two: Offences under the Cybercrimes Act of Nigeria, 2023.
• Charge Three: Causing the continuing kidnap of Zagiru Ibrahim, punishable under the Edo State Kidnapping Prohibition Amendment Law.

These are serious criminal allegations. The presiding judge, Honourable Justice Etinosa, exercised discretion despite a request by the prosecution for a six-month remand.

Facts Over Narratives

Harrison claimed he walked in voluntarily. The obvious question remains: if that were the case, why did he not walk out?

VDM reiterates that his role is not to jail individuals. His role is to expose what he calls the “truth hole” — a permanent doubt created when facts contradict personal narratives.

The Pattern of Public Accountability

History has shown that after the noise fades, the truth remains. Past cases involving public figures eventually confirmed VDM’s assertions months later. Integrity, once proven repeatedly, becomes undeniable.

Statement Summary

Recommended Action Points

• Publicly Document Charge Discrepancies
  Preserve and archive official court records that contradict public claims.
• Monitor Narrative Shifts
  Track changes in public statements and captions for damage-control patterns.
• Maintain Evidence-First Communication
  Prioritize documents and verifiable records over opinions or emotional appeals.
• Prepare Follow-Up Disclosures
  Anticipate further developments and respond with structured factual releases.